4 thoughts on “The Possible Value of Metacrap

  1. Great post! I found your example of the digital humanities project very interesting and useful in explaining your point about analyzing context.

  2. Yep, I see traces of CIS656 all over this post 🙂
    The art of scholarly editing is often referred to as “textual criticism” due to the inherent judgment involved, and I agree with you completely: this offers another layer of interpretation for future scholars to examine addressing the question: “How did early 21st century scholarly editors view Shakespeare?”

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s